FAQ
This is the FAQ from the 2005 General Election. The FAQ for the local elections in 2006 can be read here.
We want you to register to vote. Then, when the election comes
around, we want people who live in 'safe' Labour seats or
marginal ones to vote for the candidate most likely to beat
the Labour candidate. Not the anti-war-person, or the seems-like-a-nice-person,
but the candidate most likely to beat the Labour candidate.
We're using satire with an Orwellian tone to reach people.
We realise some folks may be challenged/confused by this;
that's why we have an FAQ.
People involved in this campaign pretty much want to get rid
of Blair and bring a halt to his style of government. We hope
that includes you. Common beefs include Iraq, the erosion
of civil liberties, Blair's almost unquestioning loyalty to
the Bush administration and the Blair government's ongoing
swing to the right.
Our ultimate goal is to significantly reduce Labour's majority.
We hope this will weaken Blair's position within the Labour
party and lead to a viable leadership challenge.
But for a protest vote to be effective, it must be visible
and damaging.
You won't have to. In the unlikely event that a marginal seat
pops up with a c*ntdidate this strong, we will drop it from
our campaign.
Suck it up. There's a job to be done.
For more reasons why, read Tories
are Terrorists
Sorry, there are only 13 exceptions, these being Labour MPs
who have consistently opposed the Government on a broad range
of fundamental issues including Iraq, ID Cards, Anti-Terror
Laws, Top-up Fees, Foundation Hospitals and House of Lords
Reform. Isn't that depressing? Only 13 MPs out of 412.
If your local MPs isn't one of the 13 then tough. Even Robin
Cook is a viable target. Labour candidates need to know what
Blair's ongoing leadership has/will/may cost them. We want
survivors of the protest vote to come away determined to unseat
Blair.
And we couldn't give a toss about the performance of an MP
regarding their service to the local community. The invasion
of a country that presents no threat to us on the basis of
thin and politically-influenced intelligence sets a dangerous
precedent that threatens us all. The same goes for detaining
people without trial. Domestic issues pale into insignificance
next to such things, I'm afraid.
Good question. Blair is just as likely to use the Conservative
bogey-man as he has used the terrorist bogey-man - and we
do not deny the actual (if slim) threat in either case. However:
1. How far does Blair have to swing to the
right before you realise we're already living with a Tory
government?
2. Let's assume that the Tories bridge what
is a very large gap and win. They will only do so by the narrowest
of margins, and in the coming years they will face stiff opposition
from surviving Labour MPs who know what Blair's swing to the
right has cost them. We will at the very least have balance
in government and something approaching accountability. We
don't have that now.
Link to the site. Donate money. Join or form a group and take
action. Your country needs you.
Yes.
|